The Use of ChatGPT in Physical Education: Advantages, Challenges, and Prospects in the Educational Process
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Physical Education, Educational Process, Program Evaluation, Teaching InnovationAbstract
The purpose of this research was to examine the use of ChatGPT in the field of Physical Education (P.E.), highlighting the advantages and challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence into the educational process. The study focuses on the capabilities offered by ChatGPT, such as the development and evaluation of educational programs, supporting teachers in creating curricula and delivering lessons, as well as providing quality feedback to students. Additionally, it emphasizes the potential to enhance engagement and innovation in teaching, create assessment tools, and contribute to research through the analysis of large datasets and conducting literature reviews. However, the challenges related to the accuracy and objectivity of the information provided by ChatGPT, potential biases in the model's training data, and the reliance on technology that may limit the development of critical thinking in students are also addressed. Ethical issues concerning the proper use and protection of data are discussed as well. In conclusion, the integration of ChatGPT in P.E. offers significant opportunities to improve the educational process, but careful use and continuous evaluation are required. Future prospects include the development of strategies to reduce limitations and further integrate innovative technologies in education.
References
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2024). Unveiling the shadows: Beyond the hype of AI in education. Heliyon, 10 (9), art. no. e30696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610-23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bevans, K. B., Fitzpatrick, L. A., Sanchez, B. M., Riley, A. W., & Forrest, C. (2010). Physical education resources, class management, and student physical activity levels: a structure-process-outcome approach to evaluating physical education effectiveness. The Journal of school health, 80(12), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00544.x
Bjorner, J. B., Chang, C. H., Thissen, D., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 16 Suppl 1, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9168-6
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2021). Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs: A Guide for Schools. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/professional_development/e-learning/cspap/_assets/FullCourseContent-CSPAP.pdf
Cribben, I., & Zeinali, Y. (2023). The benefits and limitations of ChatGPT in business education and research: A focus on management science. Operations Management and Data Analytics, 1-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404276
European Union. (2018). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union. https://gdpr-info.eu/
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Ha, T., Yu, H., Lim, B., Jung, H., Brooks, C., Krause, J., & Dauenhauer, B. (2024). Using ChatGPT in the field of kinesiology: Opportunities and considerations. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 24, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2024.01001.
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer-and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Iqbal, M., Khan, N. U., & Imran, M. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Transforming Educational Practices: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 348-359. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.349319430
Iskender, A. (2023). Holy or unholy? Interview with open AI’s ChatGPT. European Journal of Tourism Research, 34, 3414-3414. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v34i.3169
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
Killian, C. M., Marttinen, R., Howley, D., Sargent, J., & Jones, E. M. (2023). Knock, knock…Who’s there? ChatGPT and artificial intelligence-powered large language models: Reflections and potential impacts within health and physical education teacher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(3), 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2023-0058
Kohl, H. W., III, Cook, H. D., Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment, Food and Nutrition Board, & Institute of Medicine (Eds.). (2013). Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201493/
Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. American Association for Anatomy, 17, 926-931. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270
Minh, D., Wang, H. X., Li, Y. F., & Nguyen, T. N. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10088-y
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Osorio, C., Fuster, N., Chen, W., Men, Y., & Juan, A. A. (2024). Enhancing Accessibility to Analytics Courses in Higher Education through AI, Simulation, and e-Collaborative Tools. Information, 15(8), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15080430
Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. (2024) The impact of large language models on higher education: exploring the connection between AI and Education 4.0. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392091. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091
Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1549-1565. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22326
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Schmid, R., Pauli, C., Stebler, R., Reusser, K., & Petko, D. (2022). Implementation of technology-supported personalized learning—its impact on instructional quality. The Journal of Educational Research, 115(3), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2022.2089086.
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: the role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
Su, Z., Ge, S., Li, L. & Su, Y. (2024). Review Study of Integrating Ai Technology into Sports Training System. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 7134-7140. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.1649
Suguis, E. J., & Belleza, S. S. (2022). Student Engagement as Influenced by Physical Activity and Student Motivation Among College Students. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 7(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20220701.15
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://rutamaestra.santillana.com.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Classrooms-2nd-Edition-By-Carol-Ann-Tomlinson.pdf
Wang, Z. Q., Jia, Z. X., Wang, W. J., & Bu, X. G. (2024). New Productivity in Higher Education: Enhancing University PE Teacher Growth and Development. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.1210003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
